Previously I introduced the idea of ๐๐ฑ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐๐ - the ability to respond with agile, business-focused questions as new information emerges.
All very well, but... โ๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ฅ๐ฐ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ค๐ฐ๐ข๐ค๐ฉ ๐ช๐ต?โ
You donโt coach Adaptive Curiosity during the customer meeting.
The customer meeting is the exam.
The coaching happens before and after.
Before the meeting, many managers help their salesperson prepare a list of questions.
I think thereโs a better approach.
Prepare for the possible ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ the conversation might take.
If the customer delays the projectโฆwhere might that lead?
If they tell us another initiative has become the priorityโฆ what might be driving that?
If budget suddenly becomes an issueโฆwhat else could be sitting behind it?
Youโre not coaching questions.
Youโre coaching thinking.
Then comes the customer meeting.
The salesperson listens.
The customer provides signals.
The conversation adapts.
Afterwards comes the most important part.
Donโt just review the deal.
Review the thinking.
Which customer answers changed the direction of the conversation?
Which signals did you recognise?
Which ones did you miss?
Where could your curiosity have gone one step deeper?
Over time, something interesting happens.
Salespeople stop relying on prepared questions.
They begin recognising patterns.
They learn which customer answers deserve another question, and which can simply be acknowledged before moving on.
Thatโs how experience develops.
And thatโs how great coaching accelerates it.
Every customer meeting should create value for the customer.
Every customer meeting should also create learning for the salesperson.
If only the opportunity moves forward, youโve had a ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ meeting.
If the opportunity ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ the salesperson move forward, youโve had a ๐ต๐๐ด๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ณ๐๐น meeting.
The best sales managers understand the difference.
Adaptive curiosity II
Previous
Previous
Adaptive curiosity III
Next
Next